Complaints Policy
UPDATED: April 2024
This document provides guidelines for resolution and the treatment of complaints made by our patients. Each employee is responsible for reviewing the elements of the policy below. Also, the employee’s signature is required to confirm the reading of the organization’s policy.
1. POLICY STATEMENT
At WELL Health Diagnostic Centres (WHDC), we believe that if a patient wishes to file a complaint or express dissatisfaction, it should be easy for them to do so. It is WHDC’s policy to receive complaints and consider them as an opportunity to learn, adapt, improve, and provide better service.
2. PURPOSE
This policy is intended to ensure WHDC handles complaints fairly, efficiently, and effectively. Our objective is to ensure that our complaints procedure is properly and effectively implemented, and that complainants feel confident that their complaints and worries are listened to and acted upon promptly and equitably.
Our complaint management system aims to:
- allow us to respond to questions raised by patients who file complaints in a timely and cost-effective manner;
- increase patient confidence in our administrative process;
- provide information that we can use to improve the quality of our services, staff, and complaint handling.
- WHDC staff who receive a verbal complaint should try to resolve the issue immediately if possible. If staff cannot resolve the problem immediately, they should offer to refer it to the clinic leader for resolution. The complaints manager will be the named person who deals with the complaint through the process. When staff or managers receive an oral complaint, both should listen sincerely to the concerns raised by the complainant. Any contact with the complainant must be polite, courteous, and sympathetic. At all times, staff must remain calm and respectful.
- After discussing the problem, each clinic leader handling the complaint should suggest an action plan to resolve the complaint. If this action plan is acceptable, the staff member should clarify the agreement with the complainant and agree on a way in which the results of the complaint will be communicated to the complainant (i.e. by another meeting or letter).
- If the proposed action plan is not acceptable to the complainant, the staff member or clinic leaders should ask the complainant to make his or her complaint in writing to WHDC and provide a copy of the procedure and complaint form to be completed.
- In both situation, details of the complaint should be recorded on a complaint form.
- When a complaint is received in writing, it must be forwarded to the designated clinic leader, who must enter it in the Complaint Register and send an acknowledgment receipt within 24 business hours in order to establish a relationship of confidence with the person who filed the complaint.
- If necessary, further clarification should be obtained from the complainant. If the complaint is not made by the patient but on his/her behalf, the patient’s consent, preferably in writing, must be obtained in advance from the patient.
- After receiving the complaint letter, a copy of the complaint procedure must be given to the patient. Clearly explain the complaint process, the time it can take and realistic expectations.
- Immediately upon receipt of the complaint, WHDC will launch an investigation and within 48 business hours should be able to provide a full explanation to the complainant, either in writing or by arranging a phone call with the individuals concerned.
- Clinic leader must record all relevant information about the complaint and keep it as simple and accurate as possible.
- If the complaint raises potentially serious concerns, legal advice should be obtained. If legal action is taken at this stage, any investigation by WHDC under the complaint procedure should cease immediately.
- If the issues are too complex for the investigation to be completed within 48 business hours, the complainant should be informed of any delays.
- If a meeting is organized, the complainant may, if he or she wishes, be accompanied by a friend, relative or representative, such as a lawyer.
- At the meeting, a detailed explanation of the results of the investigation should be given and an apology should also be made if deemed appropriate. This type of meeting gives WHDC the opportunity to show the complainant that the matter has been taken seriously and has been thoroughly investigated.
- Finally, the results of the survey and meeting should be documented and any weaknesses in WHDC’s procedures should be identified and modified.